The California Psychologist, FEATURE ARTICLE, January/February, 2008, pages
14-15.

What is Positive Psychology?
Francine Toder, PhD
What is right with life? As a
practitioner I would like to have the resources to focus on the whole
continuum, from the most negative to the most positive thoughts and emotions
that all contribute to the life experience. My concern is the lack of balance,
the inability many of our clients have to modulate emotions because they are so
heavily weighted toward the negative. My goal in writing this article is not to
retell the emerging history of positive psychology since it is much more
comprehensively detailed elsewhere, but to talk about it from the perspective
of a clinician who for the past forty years has been immersed in psychopathology
and wants to expand how to think about, understand, communicate and teach the
rest of the story.
I searched for tools that would allow
me to move my depressed clients beyond "neutral" functioning, that
place unfortunately defined by managed care companies as the end point of
treatment. I wanted to help individuals "thrive rather than survive"
as the cliché goes. In his recent excellent book on this subject, Chris
Peterson (2006) indicates that positive psychology" ... calls for as much
focus on strength as on weakness, as much interest in building the best things
in life as in repairing the worst, and as much attention fulfilling the lives
of healthy people as to healing the wounds of the distressed" (p. 5).
Positive psychology is not a panacea.
It doesn't replace psychotherapy, but
augments it. While psychopathology is sometimes referred to as "south of
neutral," positive psychology may be described as "north of
neutral" (Peterson, n.d.). Its focus is on what goes right in life, the
scientific exploration of the upbeat end of the psychological experience
spectrum. Without negating painful experience or suffering, it attempts to go
beyond it to develop non-pathological thought patterns and to capture positive
emotions that tend to be fleeting when looking at life, inner and outer, as
strung together by painful memories. Positive psychology provides a framework:
explore positive emotions that can lay down tracks to healthy and happy
experiencing of the self.
With this in mind I began to explore
my own evolution as a clinician about fifteen years ago when I started to play
with some ideas that eventually emerged as executive coaching. At that time
this nascent field was beginning to be formalized to help high functioning
people enhance personal and interpersonal skills in the workplace. It appealed
to me because it highlighted what could be done ":" the realm of
positive development without a significant focus psychopathology. My interest
was piqued when I read the January 2000, American Psychologist special issue on happiness (Seligman
and Csikszentmihalyi, 2000) and I saw a connection between executive coaching
and positive psychology. It provided a bridge between psychopathology and
positive potential, encompassing the entire spectrum of human cognitive and
emotional experience. While executive coaching targets "north of
neutral" and positive psychology began
as a study of what is right with life, I could see the potential applications
for the "walking worried" and depressed clients in my practice.
Even when the external world
perceives us as happy and healthy,
our subjective feelings about ourselves are often quite different. The
sources of our unhappiness are varied with contributory factors both internal
and external. Unhappiness is what drives most people into therapy and while it is equipped to focus on
the experience of unhappiness, therapy usually does not center on getting folks
much beyond the neutral point
sometimes referred to as the pre-morbid state. That is, we try to help our
clients return to the state they in prior to needing and seeking professional
help.
Positive psychology spotlights the "north" side of the spectrum and based on substantive and extensive research it identifies those characteristics that influence and help to develop the subjective experience of happiness. Neither a simplistic happy face nor a platitude like "be happy, don't worry," it isn't even a new idea. The ancients had much to say about this, according to Peterson (2006) and in the 1950s the humanistic movement including giants like Carl Rogers, Abraham Maslow, Marie Jahoda's "Positive Psychology" book, and Erickson's life stages, predated Marty Seligman's ideas built upon his work about "learned optimism," (Peterson, n.d.) and later expounded in the January 2000 American Psychologist special issue (Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi, 2000
As a clinical psychologist by training, I'll leave theory generation and hypothesis testing in the very capable hands of academicians such as Marty Seligman (University of Pennsylvania) , Chris Peterson (University of Michigan) and Mihali Csikszentmihalyi (Claremont University). My goal is to take their ideas and further adapt them into strategies and tools that fit the population of healthy to less healthy adults in my practice. Ironically, even academia is endorsing applied positive psychology. Though some dismiss this new field of study as Ruff, the largest enrollment in any course in Harvard's history recently took place when a course in positive psychology was offered, and it is now a regularly scheduled and very popular offering in the Harvard undergraduate psychology program. According to The Harvard Crimson (n.d.) this course attracts both the healthy curious and those struggling with the mental health issues reflected in society at large.
Proponents of positive psychology discuss the concept of happiness and its requisite components, not in philosophical ways but based on large sample research studies. The three factors that emerge with the highest valences are: pleasure, meaningfulness and engagement; the last of which was captured by Mihali Csikszentmihalyi (1990) in his book Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience in which he demonstrated that the ability to be so fully absorbed and engaged in an activity that the passage of time is not noticed, contributes to the experience of happiness.
It is one thing to identify, measure and teach these concepts but another to address a range of people in our consulting rooms, the clinically depressed and those who are functioning optimally, and provide all of them with an opportunity to increase their happiness. Exercises that emerge from this orientation tend to counter the steady stream of negative thoughts experienced by many depressed individuals by bringing to awareness and helping to acknowledge the good things that are actually present in their lives. Those who are high functioning might find that this process further reinforces their optimistic feelings or increases their inspiration or creativity. While these ideas might fit the paradigm of cognitive behavioral therapy, they do appear to go beyond. Of course, for some treatment styles these views might not apply.
For additional information, an extremely useful website developed to both assess and inform people about the qualities that are measured by positive psychologists was begun and continues to be supported by Marty Seligman and his research associates now scattered throughout the world. It is: http://www.authentichappiness.sas.upenn.edu.
In
this brief article I am not able to do justice to the concept of positive
psychology. Hopefully your curiosity has been stirred and you may wish to further
explore some of these ideas to augment what is possible in your psychology
practice.
References
Peterson, C (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peterson, C (Undated). North of Neutral Topic of a session presented in a course taught on Positive Psychology, University of Michigan.
Seligman, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Eds.) (2000). Special issue on happiness, excellence and optimal human functioning. American Psychologist. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
Resources
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
The Science of Smiling, The Harvard Crimson (n.d.). Retrieved from http:/www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=511334.
Schoch, R. (2006). The secrets of happiness: Three thousand years of searching for the good life. New York: Scribner.
Seligman, M. (1991). Learned New York: Knopf.
Francine A. Toder, PhD, is a clinical psychologist and also has a degree in industrial 6- organizational psychology. Her practice is located in Palo Alto, California where she of fin-psycho therapy, executive coaching and consulting. She holds emeritus faculty status at California State University, Sacramento. She has authored two books and more than 20 articles and book chapters. Her website is www.executive-coach.com.
___________________________________________________________
Santa Clara County Psychological Association(SCCPA) Newsletter
October-November 2006
“Emotional Intelligence” for the Masses"
Francine Toder, Ph.D.
I am delighted to see that one of my favorite concepts has made it into the mainstream literature. It’s been eleven years since Daniel Goleman popularized the phrase “emotional intelligence” with a book so titled and a keynote speech at the American Psychological Association meeting in San Francisco. I was excited about it then; however, the concept was almost unknown in Silicon Valley corporate settings, where talented technology founders and brilliant engineers all too frequently lack the people skills that in Goleman’s words, make “stars into superstars.”
That was indeed then. Recently, though, the September 3, 2006 issue of Parade magazine (which is included with the San Jose Mercury News and other newspapers), featured an article by Goleman wrapping his concept in a new name and distilling it for the masses. Entitled “Can You Raise Your Social IQ?” it is a watered down and narrowed perspective of his earlier writings to pique the interest of lay readers. Still, the notion that people can actually raise their social IQ is tantalizing. And just as Goleman did in his first book, he grounded his ideas in neuroscience. It seems easier to sell a notion if it’s derived from science, rather than from its softer cousin, psychology. Golman says, for example, “We’re now learning that social intelligence also includes the ability to use our inborn neurological links to others in the best possible ways.” This allows us to extrapolate to empathy and social skill development, which is what he is really talking about.
For years in my practice of psychology as an executive coach (I am also a clinician), I avoided using the two words “emotional intelligence,” I thought it might suggest that my consulting was touchy/feely and soft. But ironically, the concept has actually been well received. This is because it emphasizes skills not taught in MBA programs and engineering schools. It gives an edge to those who learn the intrapsychic and interpersonal tools that lead to enhanced communication. Of course communication isn’t an end in itself, because we’re talking about the corporate world and not the inner sanctum of psychotherapy. The bottom line is profit, and the theory that these softer skills result in increased corporate revenue needs to be demonstrated. In fact, research over the years has validated this outcome.
Emotional Intelligence is a neat idea which pulls together many qualities encompassed in what Goleman refers to as the “Emotional Competence Framework.” This concept is a prime focus in his second book, Working with Emotional Intelligence (1998). Although I originally became enamored with his thoughts as they pertained to my executive coaching clients, I later saw the value in using these notions with my high functioning psychotherapy patients in a psycho-educational way. People seem to resonate with the competencies Goleman categorizes as “Personal Competence” and “Social Competence”, which we might conceptualize as “intrapsychic” and “inter-personal”.
Personal Competence includes:
1. Self-Awareness (emotional awareness, accurate self-assessment and self-confidence);
2. Self Regulation (self-control, trustworthiness, conscientiousness, adaptability and innovation);
3. Motivation (achievement drive, commitment, initiative
and optimism).
Social Competence includes:
1. Empathy (understanding others, developing others,
service orientation, leveraging
diversity and political awareness);
2. Social Skills (influence, communication, conflict
management, leadership, change
catalyst, building bonds, collaboration and cooperation and team capabilities).
Goleman’s concept of emotional intelligence is not new; rather, it is based on an earlier model introduced by psychologists Peter Salovey and John D. Mayer (1990). In fact, some of the ideas can be traced back to psychologist E.L Thorndike in the 1920’s, and there have been intermediary players along the way. But that’s enough about history!
Daniel Goleman, a former New York Times science writer and psychologist, had the journalistic talent to find and describe incredible numbers of real world examples, put flesh on this framework, and write in an engaging, but research-based style that few psychologists can achieve. His fourth book on the subject, titled Social Intelligence: The new Science of Human Relationships, will be published later this month.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Francine Toder, Ph.D. is the founder of Silicon Valley Executive Coaching, a consulting firm for professionals, executives, managers, entrepreneurs, and small business owners. Her web site is: www.executive-coach.com.
Dr. Toder has an office in Palo Alto where she also practices clinical psychology and serves a clientele of mostly high functioning adults. She has 30+ years of experience in therapy, consulting, teaching, training and coaching. She is an emeritus faculty member at California State University, Sacramento where she spent a very satisfying twenty-six years. ◊
_____________________________________________________________
Social Smarts
Experts say the secret to getting
ahead in you career comes down to social intelligence.
BY TRACI VOGEL
WAVE MAGAZINE
WWW.THEWAVEMAG.COM March 12-25, 2008
We've all heard
the quintessential high school reunion story: the class nerd, socially inept
and the butt of jokes, returns in a limo, flashing cash from his or her
successful business venture. Brains win out in the end, just like your teacher
told you.
But what about
the average but popular student - the George W. Bush - who makes good~ Daniel
Goleman, the psychologist and journalist, pondered this question in his 2006
book, Social
Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships.
"For years
I've wondered why some people who do so well in school go nowhere in life,
while others of ordinary academic talent rise to the top," he wrote.
"The valedictorian of my high school class, Sheldon, went on to start one
of the first patent law firms in Silicon Valley. No surprise there - we all
knew Sheldon was brilliant. The real surprise was my friend Kent: He ' was an average student
but socially adept. By our 40th reunion, he had become CEO of his own cable
company, sold it and was living contentedly on a golf course in Florida."
Brains may be
the biggest marker of success in school, but we need another kind of smarts to
reach the top in life: social intelligence, which Goleman defines as "the
aptitude that makes us smart in our relationships." People with high
social intelligence tend to be likable, influential, even inspirational.
They're able to "click” with others without seeming ingratiating, and they
make you want to work for them. How do they do it?
Francine Toder,
Ph.D., a consultant, psychologist, and executive coach based in Palo Alto,
teaches people to be more efficient managers in part by increasing their social
intelligence. "The typical scenario is a person with superior tech skills,
like an engineer or scientist," she says. "They're highly valued and
often highly paid, and they're very good at what they do."
The problem is,
the skills that make a good individual performer don't necessarily make a good
manager. "1 remember an engineer I worked with that was very talented, but
he would blow up," Toder notes. Silicon Valley has no shortage of people that
are very talented but have bad tempers."
Toder helps
these clients understand how others see them. "When you're not aware of
your own limitations, there's no buy-in," she explains. Self-awareness -
the ability to be conscious of one's emotions and accurately assess them - is
one of the pillars of social intelligence, along with self-regulation (the
ability to regulate one's emotions), and self-motivation.
Once a person is
cognizant of how they're perceived and how their emotions affect others,
they're ready to learn social skills such as empathy." It is these higher level skills that allow for reading
another person's moods, understanding their motivations, and navigating a path
through the minefield of interpersonal relationships.
After all, as
Toder reminds us, "A workplace is like any other social system - it's more
effective if people can communicate with each other accurately. There is
synergy in that and it
creates
a better work place. There is a lot of evidence that the ROI [return on
investment] in the corporate world is really affected by the ability of a
team to work together effectively."
Far from being
touchy-feely psychobabble, these kinds of lessons are based in recent
discoveries in neuroscience. Human beings, it turns out, may be equipped with
"mirror neuron" networks. These neurons fire when we see
another person performing
an action or experiencing an emotion. It's been proposed that mirror neurons enable
us to understand other people's intentions - an understanding that's invaluable
when it comes to office politics or to motivating employees.
"These are
the subtleties that really make a difference in one's ability to navigate in a
really tricky, complex environment," says Toder. "People that are
more aware of what they’re thinking, what they're feeling, who know what their
emotions are and how to manage them, and who know what others feel and think, just have an advantage.
It's such an
advantage, says Toder, that many companies are making such training a perk.
"There is this interest in social intelligence," she says. More and
more people in MBA programs and
engineering programs are beginning to learn about management styles and
leadership training.
"There are
people I see who arc technically brilliant, and sometimes people say, 'Let's
make an exception for him or her,'" Toder continues. "I'm not going
to name names, but there are several CEOs of companies in Silicon Valley that
are almost impossible to work for, but people are willing to tolerate them
because they're so unique. It gets old."
The old model of
the eccentric, unstable genius may be on its way out the door. The new model
will be much more fun to work for. TW
Francine Toder, Ph.D., 667 Lytton Ave., Palo Alto (650) 325-4588 www.doctoder.com
_____________________________________________________________
Palo Alto Daily News, Sept. 28, 2001
Aftermath of attack reaches the workplace
By Francine Toder*
The unthinkable happened on September 11th and the U.S. is grieving. It’s been just over two weeks and many of us are still in shock, dragging ourselves to our jobs, living our lives in slow motion, and feeling guilty for the comfort that surrounds us – much of which was taken for granted only recently.
The process of recovery from disaster is slow at ground zero as well as within each of us. Healing takes time. It takes less time if a support network is available which for most of us means having someone to talk with. At times like this even the most stoic of us allows a few feelings, maybe even a few tears to be expressed. We seem to understand that in this very dark moment emotions such as sadness, anger and fear are allowable, even necessary. A “window of the psyche” opens a bit to allow us a way of communicating that is usually not possible. We talk to each other with compassion, with caring, with shared understanding. The usual levels of guardedness, self- protection or propriety are just not there. Even normally “tough” New Yorkers, including this transplant, have set aside their protective shells to treat one another tenderly.
Rivals meet in the foxhole
On the national level, we’re seeing the same phenomenon. When legislative leaders of both parties found themselves in bunkers in Washington, D.C. following the September 11th attack many discovered new facets of their colleagues. They got to know each other in a different way – no partisanship in the trenches. Fundamentally, they had a very human, shared experience. It provided a bridge to communicate which allowed adversaries a chance to listen and talk in deep and meaningful ways. A common language emerged allowing an emotional connection that was helpful. The barriers were down, at least for that moment. Time will tell if the bridge is durable.
At the local level this phenomenon is repeating itself. You might say that since September 11th we are all rowing together because we’re in the same boat! The petty and sometimes significant differences between us have dropped away, if only temporarily. We acknowledge each other with genuine caring and concern, even in the workplace.
Perhaps this is one of the few positive outcomes from the recent horrific events. The workplace is a setting where people are put together with others based on the necessary skill sets to move the mission of the business forward. Personal characteristics usually aren’t considered relevant which leaves only one primary language – the business product or service. Worse still, we tend to be attracted to people who look or behave much like ourselves, further narrowing our perceptions. It’s no wonder that work teams struggle to function effectively. Individuals bring their stereotypes, values, personality styles and own agendas making interpersonal communication and cooperation strained and impersonal in ordinary times. But this is no ordinary time.
Walls broken down
For many years companies have sent work teams to “off sites,” experiential workshops, or trust exercises in the wilderness precisely because these produce a shared experience. Team members develop new ways to relate to one another that often bypass the differences that seemed so obvious and significant before. September 11th was an unplanned shared experience. Our humanness and pride as Americans has emerged as a bonding mechanism.
As a psychologist who works with individuals and teams in the workplace, I have seen a distinct shift, a lowering of defenses, and an opening in the wall that has kept us from knowing each other. I have heard stories first-hand about CEOs and board members who are talking to each other more caringly which is actually helping productivity. Teams have coalesced because they are open to hearing things in a new way from someone who they now understand a bit better.
At a business meeting of professionals, formally suited men and women were shedding tears and talking about the new shared experience that bonds them together. I can’t help but think that this way of relating will carry over even when the memory of September 11th is not so painfully acute.
An important “time-out”
Our recent tragedy gave us a time out from everyday life. For some of us it may have been the first time-out we’ve had. It forced us to take a big-picture look at things – family, relationships of all sorts, the meaning of life. It has given us a chance to see things from a slightly different perspective – one of the necessary ingredients for fostering creativity. Because everything came to a grinding halt, apart from the images of fire and destruction, we may have been willing to reflect on our own values, goals and aspirations. It is that, that allowed us to be open and vulnerable. Not only did it make us better people but we may also be more effective in the workplace where shared experience of national tragedy has brought us together.
*Francine Toder, Ph.D. is a consultant, psychologist and executive coach with an office and home in Palo Alto.
_______________________________________________________________________
November, 2001
A SOMBER TRIP
HOME
I
certainly wasn’t the only psychologist to respond to the need to serve
following the September 11th destruction at the World Trade
Center. In fact, more than 2000
psychologists from across the country contacted the disaster network of the
American Psychological Association or the American Red Cross and descended on
New York, Washington, D.C. and western Pennsylvania.
I
also wasn’t the first to get to New York.
In fact, I wasn’t deployed until November 3rd. In part, I felt that after the initial
crisis and adrenaline driven response, disaster workers and residents might be
more ready and open to talk and to receive the kind of support that a mental
health professional could provide.
Temporarily leaving my practice was my own way of doing something,
instead of feeling helpless as a citizen watching and experiencing this
unprecedented attack. Born and
raised in New York City, I felt an urgent calling to return to my “homeland”.
Who
could have foreseen that I would be the first psychologist to reach Rockaway
after the crash of American Airlines 587.
What follows is my personal experience and my observation of a tough and
resilient people who have had more than their share to deal with.
Rockaway Beach
As
if the mood in New York weren’t somber enough, the crash of this latest plane
ratcheted up the general nervousness several notches. The site was less than ¼ mile from where I was stationed and
I saw the plumes of black smoke as I was riding in a Red Cross Emergency Response
vehicle on my way to deliver food and water to disaster workers at “Ground
Zero”.
It
was ironic that a Red Cross volunteer from Rhode Island with firefighting
experience was first on the scene, before the firefighters. He put out the fire caused by one of
the engines plummeting to within feet of a gas station’s pump. Later he called for others to bring
drinking water for the firefighters who soon arrived at the site. In general, Red Cross volunteers seemed
to me an amazingly generous and committed group coming from mostly small towns
across the U.S. and Canada. When
asked why they came to New York City I heard again and again that at home you
went to the aid of your neighbors in distress. This was just an extension of that philosophy.
I
was initially called to Rockaway Beach to talk with local residents who were
traumatized by the crash from either seeing the crash itself or the destruction
of homes, their own or their neighbors.
I saw disbelief, anger and fear on their faces as they assembled at the
barriers constructed at the crash site.
A temporary morgue was set up within their view. They came alone or in families. Kids in
twos and threes came from the local catholic school, the Jewish Yeshiva and
public schools within blocks of the site. They came to gawk, cry and inquire about the safety of their
neighbors.
A
woman rocked as she sat on her porch steps facing the burned out remains of the
house across the street. Sitting
with her I learned that her only child, a 25 year old, died three years ago in
a fiery car crash and now she was living and reliving two tragedies. Her story was not unique as I soon
discovered talking with other residents.
A Red Cross co-worker comforted and then brought another woman in shock.
Her house was demolished with a piece of the plane sitting in what had been her
front yard. Even though all of the
tangible reminders of her former life were taken by the fire, she was focused
on a mother and child, neighbors across the street, who had perished in the
fire. She was also re-living an
earlier loss, the death of her husband, who was a police officer killed in the
line of duty nine years ago. Over
and over I saw people being re-traumatized, this crash being just the latest
assault on their lives. The
earlier horrible events on September 11th were recalled with renewed
intensity and superimposed on the current loss. Rockaway lost 84 people at the
World Trade Center. On top of what
happened before, this was almost unbearable.
The
owner of the Harbour Light, a bar & grill on the corner near the crash,
lost his son on September 11th
at the World Trade
Center. He opened his place to all
disaster workers to use the facilities and relax. His kitchen made a huge submarine sandwich for me to take to
the woman who lost her child – no charge.
The outpouring of caring for others was evident everywhere which was
heart-warming in this community already in mourning. As I witnessed the drama unfolding I remembered that in
spite of New Yorkers’ usually rough and seemingly detached style, there is
passion and compassion that surfaces when times get tough.
Ground Zero – The World Trade Center
Wearing
a helmet, goggles and face mask I left my emergency response vehicle and
entered a surreal space with a smell defying description that permeated the
air. Some said it smelled like
death. A few suggested an
electrical smell like a melted toaster cord. The heat from smoldering hills of rubble rose from the
ground and manholes.
On
the way to delivering food and drink to the makeshift police station at Ground
Zero the air was so heavy that walking the flight of stairs took enormous
effort. The whole scene was eerie
and seemed like a black and white movie in slow motion. Television doesn’t do it justice. Other
disaster workers seemed to talk little with each other, communicating through
eyes that were sad and intense.
What I observed was somber, resolved and uncommonly respectful. In fact, casting a wider net, New
Yorkers much beyond Ground Zero seemed very subdued. New York was humbled by September 11th and you
could see it reflected in locals’ behavior – less horn honking, more courteous
encounters and recognition of sorrow in each others’ faces. It was business as
usual but with a tenderness never before seen in New York City.
The Landfill – Staten Island
Winding
my way up to the top of the landfill I could see at a glance, by the names on
trucks parked here and there, that this was no ordinary place. Enormous hills of mangled metal dotted
the landscape. I knew what was in
the piles and why there were people raking the ground and why others were
watching debris pass over a conveyer belt. The mission of this place is awesome: trying to separate
building materials from human remains.
Even
though I was acquainted with the facts, I wasn’t prepared for the mood of this
place – somber, quiet and for a New York setting, uncharacteristically
gentle. A walk through the mess
hall where hundreds of exhausted disaster workers eat round the clock, there
was a sense of seriousness and comradery.
Outside it was very cold, the wind was howling and it was hard to keep
the swirling dust and debris out of my eyes.
The slow, painstaking work is critical because it’s both a crime scene and because the losses are very personally felt by the locals, many of whom have lost someone or have a friend who did. This is sacred work, made clear by the 50 kosher lunches we delivered daily for the orthodox Jews who bless the ground where bodies have been brought, Jewish and every other religion, but can’t be definitively identified. I thought that the whole landfill ought to be regarded as a sacred burial ground or identified as a memorial site – the final resting place for so many people and part of the city itself. Hopefully this would mark the end of a tragedy and a step toward recovery.
Francine Toder, Ph.D. is a clinical psychologist and
executive coach in Palo Alto. She
is the former chair of the Disaster Readiness & Response committee for the Santa
Clara County Psychological Association.